CLC

CLC consumer empowerment efforts having ‘measurable impact’

Work by the Council for Licensed Conveyancers (CLC) to empower consumers is having “a significant, measurable impact,” the Legal Services Board (LSB) has been told.

In its report to the LSB, the CLC also outlined its experience of co-operation with HM Land Registry and the Legal Ombudsman (LeO), as well as other legal regulators, that aims to put more information into the public domain that can help consumers find and choose a lawyer.

Following the Competition and Markets Authority’s call to drive more choice in the legal market, the LSB published a Statement of Policy on Empowering Consumers in April 2022 and gave regulators a 30th September 2024 deadline to provide assurance about how they are meeting the expectations it sets out.

The CLC’s submission pointed out the 2024 Tracker Survey issued by the Legal Services Consumer Panel showed that 54% of consumers who most recently used a licensed conveyancer shopped around for that service, compared to 41% for all legal services and 48% of those who had recently used conveyancing services (from any provider). Such data in relation to probate services, which the CLC also regulates, was not available.

The findings indicate either that the CLC’s Informed Choice rules are having a greater impact than is average for the legal sector or, when consumers shop around, they are more likely to choose a licensed conveyancer than another provider.

“Given that both factors are likely to contribute to the finding, we can say that the CLC’s Informed Choice regime is effective and is having a significant, measurable impact,” the submission said.

The CLC’s Informed Choice framework came into force in December 2018 – setting out what and how practices should publish to assist consumers. Monitoring and enforcing compliance quickly became part of the day-to-day operations of the CLC and compliance levels are high. The submission said:

“Compliance is kept under review in the same way as all other regulatory expectations, through monitoring, including face to face inspections, and intelligence received. Failures to comply with the CLC’s expectations in this area are generally easy to remediate and have not proved challenging…

We cannot be complacent, however. Overall levels of shopping around could be increased, clearly, and the CLC is committed to continuing to bear down on consumer complaints.”

The proportion of transactions involving licensed conveyancers that result in complaints to LeO is very low – roughly 1 in 400 transactions by CLC lawyers lead to complaint investigated by LeO and only around 1 in 2,750 results in a full ombudsman decision. These underline the very high levels of satisfaction with licensed conveyancers (91% satisfied with both the outcome and service) shown in the Tracker Survey.

The CLC is still in discussion with LeO about published data and how it can be used:

“Once the data is clean and reliable, we will consult on ways that it could be made available to consumers.”

The submission also explains how the CLC has decided to adopt the British Standard definition of vulnerability and will be advising firms on how to put that into practice in their work, and is part way through joint research with the Bar Standards Board and CILEx Regulation that aims to find ways to tackle digital exclusion more effectively.

CLC Chief Executive Sheila Kumar led the cross-regulator work to implement the Competition and Markets Authority recommendations and the CLC has also played a leading role in the development of the Legal Choices website, which is exceeding its targets for engagement. She says:

“The Competition and Markets Authority identified a shortage of information for consumers of legal services. The CLC’s role in the cross-sector initial response and in the development of the Legal Choices website alongside our commitment to our Informed Choice agenda is delivering significantly positive results.

We are not complacent, though – we know there is still some way to go and are determined to progress the work with other regulators and stakeholders to ensure that consumers are able to make an informed choice of legal service provider in a way that works for each consumer.”

3 responses

  1. So CLC, please tell all us hard working competent professional conveyancers why it is that so many of your members are a complete nightmare to deal with, and do not seem to be getting any better in terms of their professional standards? Indeed if anything they seem to be getting worse, which is saying something.

    How does that situation fit in with your aim to empower consumers? Surely the best way to have consumers exposed to better quality legal work is for you to pay closer attention to the poor standards of your members, after all this is something you must have been aware of for several years and yet it continues to go on unchecked? Rather than continuing to release press briefings that those of us in the profession do not recognise, why not take action against the bad conveyancers who continue to give us all a bad name and provide poor service to clients?

    1. I am CLC regulated and while I agree some ABS volume firms are a nightmare to deal with, there is also a staggering number of SRA regulated firms/solicitors themselves who are equally appalling in terms of professional standards and compliance with the conveyancing protocol etc. The SRA should pay close attention to the poor standards of some of their members. We cannot tar all professionals with the one brush.

  2. I employ a Licensed Conveyancer and he’s fantastic.

    I do think CLC is turning a blind eye to the chaos that conveyancing factories they regulate cause to consumers and to related transactions and to chains.
    Maybe that’s because those who run the CLC factories have positions of power or influence with CLC? Who knows. But the fact they have done nothing nor said anything about lengthening transaction times is worrying if indeed the consumer experience is of concern.

Want to have your say? Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Read more stories

Join over 7,000 conveyancing professionals – Check back daily for all the latest news, views, insights and best practice and sign up to our e-newsletter to receive our daily and weekly round ups

You’ll receive the latest updates, analysis, and best practice straight to your inbox.

Features