Leaseholders Seek Compensation From Conveyancers

Leaseholders Seek Compensation From Conveyancers

Following the recent announcement from James Brokenshire, Secretary for Housing, Communities and Local Government, of the Government’s plans to cap ground rent at £10 per year, a law firm has also announced that they will be working on behalf of 500 leaseholders to seek compensation for a lack of adequate information before they bought their property.

The leaseholders’ claim that they were poorly informed of the consequences of a leasehold property and are therefore looking to be compensated by the conveyancing firms they instructed.

FS Legal, based in Birmingham and Manchester, have sent pre-action notification letters to the conveyancing firms involved. Among other grievances, the leaseholders believe that they were not informed about subtle nuances in the leasehold agreement, like doubling of ground rents, extending the lease title and buying the freehold.

Gareth Fatchett, Solicitor and Partner at FS Legal, said: “Firms will have a decision to make – whether they accept they have not provided advice to the standard they should have done. If they accept that they have not, the issue is “what damage have we caused?”

“We have done, historically, lots of work around pensions, failed investment schemes. We’re quite used to dealing with cases where people’s main assets are a significant chunk of their savings. With people’s homes – it’s not a financial attachment, it’s an emotional attachment… People have bought something which, if they had known the risk, they would not have bought it or would have bought it at a significantly different price.’

The Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government, has said:  “It is unfair for leaseholders to be required to pay economic rents at levels which are solely designed to serve the commercial purposes of the developer and any future investors. Furthermore, leaseholders see no material benefits from these payments.”

When the average leasehold ground rent is over £350 per year, leaseholders are struggling to find the additional money needed to pay exaggerated and unfair fees. Although buyers have a huge part to play in understanding the terms of their mortgage and leasehold agreement, FS Legal will argue that the experts should be more vocal in explaining the potential difficulties associated with leasehold property.

Who is responsible for informing the buyer about leasehold property? Should the conveyancer take the blame for a buyers naivety? 

Martin Parrin

Martin is a Senior Content Writer for Today’s Conveyancer, Today’s Wills and Probate, Today’s Legal Cyber Risk and Today's Family Lawyer

Having qualified as a teacher, Martin previously worked as a Secondary English Teacher that responsible for Head of Communications.

After recently returning to the North West from Guernsey in the Channel Islands, Martin has left teaching to start a career in writing and pursue his lifelong passion with the written word.


  • The answer to the posed question is yes. Conveyancers, the same as any other lawyer is paid to advise and many do not. This is, however, the problem with turning conveyancing into an admin. exercise at low cost.

    • Your remark about low cost is wrong, it was basically the same as the others,. However we were given assurances that the completion date would be as given.

    • Agree with David Lewis that conveyancers should be made responsible but believe that an “admin exercise” could involve applying artificial intelligence to leases which may well be better at identifying obscenely escalating ground rents than people

      Hope that the stress of being landed with such arrangements will be accepted as a head of compensation

      And that failure to use protective technology results in higher PI premiums

  • In Scotland, leasholds have been abolished, therefore no rent to worry about – and no short leases either. OK their property law is different and probably lends itself to enforcement of covenants between flat owners. However surely legislation could be introduced in England to enable flats to become freehold in the same way. Houses have never had to be leasehold. It’s simply a historical thing in some parts of England (not the South-East thankfully) and now as the article say it provides an opportunity to greedy developers. As to blaming solicitors however, this seems a little unfair. Just the concept of leaseholds is extremely difficult for many people to grasp together with the amount of documentation that an average purchase generates which buyers have to try to read through and understand. Warnings about rent could easily get lost in the mountain of paperwork these people have to try to grapple with.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.