FCA fines Santander

FCA fines Santander over £100m for numerous AML failings

Investigation reveals failings amassed over almost five years

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has fined Santander over £100 million due to “serious and persistent gaps” in its anti-money laundering (AML) processes.

The FCA found that between 31 December 2012 and 18 October 2017, Santander failed to properly oversee and manage its AML systems, which significantly impacted the account oversight of more than 560,000 business customers.

It was also found that Santander had ineffective systems to adequately verify the information provided by customers about the business they would be doing. In addition to this. the firm also failed to properly monitor the money customers had told them would be going through their accounts compared with what actually was being deposited.

Mark Steward, Executive Director of Enforcement and Market Oversight at the FCA, said:

“Santander’s poor management of their anti-money laundering systems and their inadequate attempts to address the problems created a prolonged and severe risk of money laundering and financial crime.

As part of our commitment to prevent and reduce financial crime, we continue to take action against firms which fail to operate proper anti-money laundering controls.”

In one case it was found a new customer opened an account as a small translations business with expected monthly deposits of £5,000. Within six months it was receiving millions in deposits, and swiftly transferring the money to separate accounts. Although the account was recommended for closure by the bank’s own AML team in March 2014, poor processes and structures meant that this was not acted upon until September 2015. As a result, the customer continued to receive and transfer millions of pounds through its account. Santander agreed to a request from law enforcement to keep the account open in September 2015, however, it failed to keep track of this request and the account remained open until the FCA wrote to Santander in December 2016.

The FCA identified several other Business Banking accounts which Santander failed to manage correctly, leaving the bank open to serious money laundering risk. There were also examples of the bank failing to promptly deal with “red flags” associated with suspicious activity, such as automated monitoring alerts. These failures led to more than £298 million passing through the bank before it closed the accounts.

Santander knew that there were significant weaknesses in its AML systems and controls and began a programme of improvements in 2013. While these changes resulted in some improvements, Santander concluded that the changes did not adequately address the underlying weaknesses and, in 2017, decided to implement a comprehensive restructuring of its processes and systems. Santander UK continues to invest in its ongoing transformation and remediation programme.

Santander has not disputed the FCA’s findings and agreed to settle, which means it has qualified for a 30% discount. Without the discount, the financial penalty would have been £153,990,400. The final total stands at £107,793,300.

As part of its role to protect consumers and the market, the regulator has repeatedly stepped in and penalised firms for poor management of their AML systems. For example, it has fined Standard Chartered Bank £102.2 million, HSBC Bank plc £63.9 million, and its investigation led to NatWest being fined £264.8 million.

This is part of a crackdown by the FCA on AML failings after it was revealed in a survey earlier this year that almost half (47%) of UK businesses across the legal, property and finance and banking sectors admitted to not changing their approach to monitoring existing customers and almost a quarter (23%) of the firms which did monitor existing clients said they did so only annually or every six months. Overall, 77% of the property firms who responded said they had either not changed the way they monitored existing clients or even reduced checks on them.

Want to have your say? Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Read more stories

Join nearly 5,000 other practitioners – sign up to our free newsletter

You’ll receive the latest updates, analysis, and best practice straight to your inbox.

Features