50-year mortgages

50-year mortgages: do we need Generation Debt?

50-year mortgages: be careful what you wish for

The Government is looking for creative ways to turn Generation Rent into Generation Buy, but do we really want to create Generation Debt?

The Government has a problem. It wants to turn generation rent into generation buy, but the economy is working against them. House prices have risen by more than 25% since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, much, much faster than wages. Costs of living are spiralling out of control, inflation is already at a 40-year high and expected to rise further and the Government wants us not to seek pay rises, but to seek pay restraint.

The numbers don’t add up. If house prices are rising faster than wages, and mortgages are based on wages, then generation buy is shrinking, not growing.

Whilst the majority of voters are homeowners, it seems that political parties of all colours are keen to guard against house prices falling on their watch. The latest idea from Government is to let homebuyers borrow for longer. Simply put, if you increase the number of mortgage repayments you can make, you can borrow more money and if you allow aspiring first-time buyers to borrow more money you can move more of them from generation rent to generation buy. Simple. Or is it?

50-year mortgages: mortgage payments up and down

One of the advantages of paying back a mortgage over a longer term is that the monthly mortgage payments are lower, bringing a welcome boost to monthly cashflow. We show in the chart below how monthly mortgage payments fall as the term of the mortgage is increased (based on a 95% LTV mortgage for the averagely priced UK home (£280,000) with a mortgage rate of 2.5%).

graph chart 50 year mortgage payments twindig anthony codling

However, there is no such thing as a free lunch: the longer-term mortgage will cost you more in the longer run. As we illustrate below, every five years added to the mortgage term increases the total amount paid by more than £20,000 for the averagely priced UK home.

50-year mortgages: more upward pressure on house prices?

If we allow homebuyers to borrow more money, they probably will. If more money is put into the housing market then, all other things being equal, house prices will rise.

One could argue that this will lead to a situation where after a period of time first-time buyers remain unable to get onto the housing market with a 50-year mortgage, so we need to increase that 50 years to 55 or 60 years.

The challenge is where do we draw the line? It used to be 25 years, the logic being you will have a mortgage-free retirement, but now we can happily retire with our mortgages, have debt in our dotage and pass on housing debt rather than housing wealth.

Is this really the road we want to travel on?

50-year mortgages: just kicking the can down the road

In our view, lengthening the mortgage term is just a partial, short-term solution that will lead to a never-ending cycle of longer and longer mortgages that will ultimately add to the problem they are trying to solve. At the end of the day, whilst it levels some part of the housing playing field, it doesn’t solve the issue of deposits and incomes. You do not solve the issues of deposits and income inequality by tweaking how long you can be beholden to a mortgage lender for.

50-year mortgages: are longer mortgages creative?

Prime Minister Boris Johnson has said he wants to “find all sorts of creative ways to help people into ownership”. Is lengthening the term that creative?

Housing’s primary role is that of shelter and security. Along with food and clothing, shelter is one of our most basic and most important needs.

Increasingly, housing’s secondary role is as a store of wealth, an asset that can be called upon to help finance retirement or to assist other family members. The problem with housing as a store of wealth is that it is increasingly difficult to get a foot on the housing ladder to be in a position to build housing wealth and, in our view, 50-year mortgages are not the silver bullet the housing market is looking for.

Housing wealth, a question of distribution not time

Data from the English Housing Survey reveals that there are 24 million homes in England, of which 15.5 million (65%) are owned by homeowners and of these more than half (54%) are owned without a mortgage.

Graph chart showing number of homeowners who own their home without a mortgage and those with a mortgage twindig anthony codling

Across the UK, the housing loan to value ratio is just 21%, and almost 80% of the UK’s housing market is owned outright.

The gap between the “haves” and the “have nots” is startling, and unfortunately for the have nots, growing at quite a pace.

Is fractional ownership the solution?

We believe that a creative way to help turn generation rent into generation buy is through fractional ownership, where those with wealth to spare help those without enough to buy their home. This would allow much greater participation in the UK housing market and help to turn the rising tide of housing wealth inequality.

Rather than pitting the haves against the have nots or seeing the barriers to homeownership raised ever higher, why not work together and let one person’s ownership of property facilitate another’s?


One Response

  1. in 25 years full time money a lower earner can potentally earn 421, 000 unhelpful as everything else always goes up. it would be more helpful to regulate housing as the term of the mortagage always reflects the price is it much help to anyone especially as the council tax is based on house valations to

Want to have your say? Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Read more stories

Join nearly 5,000 other practitioners – sign up to our free newsletter

You’ll receive the latest updates, analysis, and best practice straight to your inbox.