Law Society comments on what SGM means for the Conveyancing Portal

On Tuesday we reported that a Law Society SGM had passed a vote of no confidence in the Law Society.

The SGM was triggered by 118 criminal legal aid practitioners who were angered by the Society’s engagement strategy with the Ministry of Justice and argued that the Society had no mandate for the actions it took.

Jonathan Smithers, Law Society deputy vice-president has commented on what the meeting means for the future of the Conveyancing Portal.

He said: “While the Society confirmed that a mandate had been granted under our constitution, in response to the views of members at the SGM we are taking a hard look at how the Society engages and communicates with its members.

“We cannot change our constitution – and therefore decision-making basis – in a hurried fashion. You can read our President’s reaction to the SGM here.

“In developing the Conveyancing Portal, we have and continue to extensively engage with practitioners.

“We have received a great level of support from the various governance bodies, practitioners and the wider conveyancing industry. This project is underway and we do not anticipate that it will be affected in any way by the SGM.”

Want to have your say? Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Read more stories

Join over 7,000 conveyancing professionals – Check back daily for all the latest news, views, insights and best practice and sign up to our e-newsletter to receive our daily and weekly round ups

You’ll receive the latest updates, analysis, and best practice straight to your inbox.

Features

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.